I woke up just a few minutes ago, lurked over to the kitchen to greet the day with my usual blend of yerba mate, nettles, oatraw, raspberry leaf & rose petals.
I then checked my email and received a flurry of freak-out emails from some of the global health foundations and nonprofits that I follow, alarming their audience to the devasting shortage of funds that are threatening crucial HIV prevention & treatment programs, tuberculosis programs & the like.
I don’t want to sound unsympathetic, but it’s happening everywhere. The economic calamity of the last 3 years has shaken social and health services to their core. In my community, so many more people are houseless, without medical care or any kind of safety net. Read more
According to Paul Ehrlich, the key limiting factor for human development on this planet as a whole is the inability for our environment to handle our waste products. Watch the video at the Stockholm Resilience Centre. Thought provoking, whether you agree or disagree with him.
I’ve been wanting to write about this book for a while. The author, John Bodley, presents the idea that there is a maximum number of interpersonal interactions that one person can grasp. Any systems (or societies) that are larger than that become too big and unmanageable to be efficient. In his words, the majority of problems faced by contemporary societies are “unintended consequences of the operation of personal power networks that have become too big and too dangerous to be safely controlled.”
He links the distribution of social power to size. And in this book he present the optimum scale idea; that there is a certain size for a societies that has (as a characteristic) the most evenly distributed social power.
As societies grow larger, it is likely that the organization of social power will need to change. A principle assumption of this book is that growth is an elite-directed process that concentrates power in the form of ever-expanding imperia. The power of scale is the reality that scale increases to mathematically produce disproportionate concentrations of power for those at the very top of any hierarchy in any power domain, while the costs of growth are likely to be socialized or borne by society at large.
You can read more about the Power of Scale: A Global History Approach here.
So size does matter. Smaller is better. There’s a great little publication called the Fourth World Review: For Small Nations, Communities, Farms, Shops, Industries, Banks, Fisheries & the Inalienable Sovereignty of the Human Spirit. They have all their issues (PDF) in their archives. So much fun!